![]() In terms of previous usage, if you’re coming from a company where all your built up libraries are in DWG and LISP format, then you should probably stick with AutoCAD. Ex-AutoCAD users will obviously have a tougher time with ePlan. ![]() ![]() Hence, ePlan is a much more directed and flexible solution with a learning easier for the unbiased. See, in comparison, ePlan was built ground up from scratch with the ideology of an electrical CAD package as opposed to a CAD package extension. A few additions to the tools and the above mentioned LISP support is all there is to ACADe. To most of the people who have used it, it’s like AutoCAD with a few simple but useful built-in functions and LISP scripts that automate the tasks of setting, up and other mundane tasks. And the e-CADing enthusiast should read on for a comparison of ePlan vs AutoCAD Electrical.ĮPlan vs AutoCAD Electrical Package ePlan ECADe Discipline Electrical CAD Generic CAD Design Top-to-bottom Functionality extension Learning curve (for new users) More than average Average Advantage Large function/feature set Industry legacy User Student – Pro Student – Pro How are they defined and which one is suitable for me?ĪutoCAD Electrical, or ECADe is another one of Autodesk’s products aiming as electrical designs and developments for pre-production analysis and review. As a computer science major, I am not jumping cliffs to learn or even read about electrical CADing, but then again that’s me. Electrical designing for all scales, forms, architectures and even more practical applications need a solid software package to integrate the non-electronic drawings with the electric magic. A peculiar topic and discipline in the field of CAD, from designing electrical circuits to laying out electrical schematics for a building, electrical CADing is a complete industry all together.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |